Artemis Showdown: SpaceX Starship vs. Blue Origin's Lunar Lander | 2023

80,791
0
2023-06-15に共有
How Will Humans Gets Back To The Moon?
⚡ Get your Ekster Wallet Today! Enjoy up to 35% for Fathers Day using the link shop.ekster.com/NSF and use code SPACE at checkout ⚡

Join us as we delve into the Artemis Program's two lunar landers, SpaceX's ambitious Starship and Blue Origin's Lunar Lander. We compare the intricacies of their designs, infrastructure, engine readiness, and overall readiness for their upcoming missions. Whether you're a SpaceX or Blue Origin fan, we provide an objective, comprehensive analysis of the cutting-edge tech being deployed for our future missions to the Moon.

🔗 NSF Store: www.nasaspaceflight.com/shop/

⚡ Become a member of NASASpaceflight's channel for exclusive discord access, fast turnaround clips, and other exclusive benefits. Your support helps us continue our 24/7 coverage. Click JOIN above to get started.⚡

🤵 Hosted & Written by Adrian Beil (@BCCarCounters)
🎥 Video from Justin S, Jack Beyer (@thejackbeyer), Space Coast Live, Starbase Live, and Stephen Marr (@spacecoast_stve).
✂️ Edited by Sawyer Rosenstein (@thenasaman).
💼 Produced by Kevin Michael Reed (@kmreed).

🔍 All content copyright to NSF. Not to be used elsewhere without explicit permission from NSF.

L2 Boca Chica (more clips and photos) from BC's very early days to today.
🔗 forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=47107.0
(Join L2 and support NSF here: www.nasaspaceflight.com/l2/)

#SpaceX #BlueOrigin #ArtemisProgram #LunarLander #Starship #Artemis3 #Artemis4 #Artemis5 #NASA #SpaceTechnology #SpaceExploration #LunarMissions #BE4Engine #RaptorEngine #LunarEngine #NewGlenn #HumanLandingSystem #PropellantTransfer #InOrbitRefueling #HydrogenFuel #LOXLH2 #ReusableSpacecraft #InterplanetaryTravel #LunarSurface

コメント (21)
  • @Fanten25
    "We never get concrete information what killed the Engines", good one Adrian ;D
  • Great video. I hope people at both companies are thinking about what would be required for their vehicle to rescue astronauts from the competitor's vehicle. Dissimilar redundancy is good.
  • I think you would need to be at least 56 years old to remember watching even the last moon landing.
  • Seems to be some acknowledgement from SpaceX that the Starship orbital test used old Raptors (new at assembly time) and old style actuators, both abandoned due to problems seen in early testing. Launched as a test of early result validity.
  • Great Job Adrian ! I love how you all are expanding on the news theme you bring us weekly!
  • Really cool video! Super organized and I liked the editing style of it!
  • I think your analysis is very fair. Both lander systems leave a lot to be desired at this point. It is also tough to know much about Blue Origin due to how "less exposed to cameras" their production is.
  • This is great, you're really good in front of the camera. Thanks for the excellent update!
  • Totally agree with your rating, but I think both companies already have some surprises in their sheds, where we hopefully get some glimpse on soon 😊
  • Yes we do really need two. Why? Safety - Boeing’s handling of their space craft shows why.
  • Great comparison Adrian, and yes please to the China updates. It would be interesting to see their plans analysed.
  • @xeddog
    Didn't I read that NASA leased half of the VAB to SpaceX? If so, how does that fit in?
  • We'll need way WAY more than two. The article should have been entitled "Why do we have only two landers planned?"
  • Nicely done Adrian, you have developed into an excellent presenter. Kudos!
  • @DipperDK
    Literally a FLY at 12:44 as Adrian is saying "Flying to LEO" 😅 EPIC video! Thanks Adrian and the rest of the NSF team. 😇
  • @pferd5639
    LOL. "We never got concrete confirmation of what exactly killed these engines . . . ".