Amillennialism with Dr. Sam Storms

The Remnant Radio
The Remnant Radio
81,292
0
Publicado 2020-04-14
In this episode, Dr. Sam Storms discusses the Amillennial perspective of the end times. He begins by clarifying that “Amillennial” is a bit of a misnomer – since he does, in fact, believe in a Millennium. It just looks different than the “literalistic” view of Historic Premillennialism. On that note, he talks through the hermeneutic to employ when interpreting apocalyptic literature—how do we know when to understand things literally or figuratively? Dr. Storms responds to the major objections to Amillennialism, he explains in detail why he is not Premillennial, and he makes a biblical case for Amillennialism. All of this is couched in his own personal journey away from Premillennialism (which his seminary taught strongly) and toward Amillennialism. If you’re interested in the end times and want to understand the biblical teaching more, you won’t want to miss this episode. Even if you don’t agree with all of Dr. Storms’ points, you’ll certainly find that he goes to the Bible to support his beliefs.

🌐📧 Visit our Website & Subscribe to our Newsletter: www.theremnantradio.com/
Todos los comentarios (21)
  • @Marsand100
    Ephesians!! That's exactly what happened to me in my journey out of dispensationalism
  • @frankr4168
    Thank you. That was what I was looking for. Your answer to amilennial was what I have been understanding all along. It's nice to see someone with the same view as mine. TY
  • @EnHacore1
    The best interview I have seen on amillennialism, and brings so much clarity to the difficult passages in Mathew.
  • @thehumanjesus
    Questions for Amill: 1. Can you explain how Satan is currently bound and not deceiving the nations (Rev 20:3) yet Satan is deceiving the nations at the same time (1 John 5:19; Rev 12:9)? 2. In your scheme WHEN do the events in Rev 20:7-10 take place? (NOTE Satan is released at that point which means Satan has been bound, I.e., has not been deceiving the nations.) 3. If “came to life” means a "spiritual conversion (?)" what does "beheaded" mean (Rev 20:4)? NOTE beheading comes before "came to life." 4. In Rev 20:4c-5 you have two resurrections, using the same words for both. So how is it possible that “the first resurrection” is not literal and the second resurrection is literal? (NOTE the noun anastasis always means a literal, physical resurrection of dead people.) 5. If there are no mortals in the kingdom how do you explain Isaiah 65-66? 6. Since in your view there’s only one resurrection of ALL the dead, what does “the rest of the dead mean” (Rev 20:5)?
  • @brendafranklin6113
    Great interview! I read through the bible chronologically last year, and amill is the ONLY view that takes ALL of scripture into consideration. Love in Christ to all!!
  • @exek337
    really enjoy your show & that you laugh & laugh at yourselves too 😊
  • @MsBeloved89
    I'm learning more about this view. So interesting.
  • @dougbell9543
    Listening to Dr. Storms is like a breath of fresh air. ✔️ Great guest, gentlemen. Thank you!
  • @kecoval
    Sounds like an awesome book, would love a copy! Thx for the interview.
  • @gramps5157
    He did a great job explaining. Very clear and easy to follow. Thank you!
  • @frankjferus950
    You guys did an awesome job! Your show blessed me so much. Thank you
  • @tdedera6900
    Hey would love this book ! Liking your programs
  • @AZ.BOT.
    Great video I found this extremely helpful thanks guys. I'll get into the books...
  • @SopranoJessi
    I agree that when Jesus comes back at His 2nd Coming, it is a culmination... It is to pour his wrath and vindicate His Bride.