The High Price of Defending Europe Against Russia

250,393
0
Published 2024-05-24
European NATO members are racing to bulk up their militaries in the face of Russian aggression and the possibility that Donald Trump, if elected in November, may try to pull the US away. But experts say NATO nations and their allies need to at least double their defense spending to deter any potential Kremlin threat.

In the Baltics, the number of allied troops is rising. It’s there that NATO is planning to station new brigades, with soldiers from Canada in Latvia, UK troops in Estonia and German forces in Lithuania. But all of these efforts, including continuing aid to Ukraine, will require a lot more funding. Alarms are ringing all across the continent about how much more NATO members will need to spend to give Russia pause, especially if Trump takes over in the White House. In 2014, when Russia invaded Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula and Donbas region, NATO members promised to spend 2% of GDP on defense. A decade later, only about half of them met that target. Though Vladimir Putin has said he has no intention of challenging NATO, experts are estimating that member states need to double their military spending to 3-4% of GDP, close to Cold War levels of spending, just in case.

Read more on Bloomberg.com: www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-06-07/nato-sc…

01:14 Baltic Countries Prepare for NATO Soldiers
03:10 NATO Defense Spending Commitments
3:50 Germany Ramps up Defense Spending
4:44 Benefiting Companies: Rheinmetall and Hensoldt
5:12 Not Enough to Deter Russia
6:20 Unequal Burden and Painful Choices

--------
Like this video? Subscribe: youtube.com/Bloomberg?sub_confirmation=1

Get unlimited access to Bloomberg.com for $1.99/month for the first 3 months: www.bloomberg.com/subscriptions?in_source=YoutubeO…

Bloomberg Originals offers bold takes for curious minds on today’s biggest topics. Hosted by experts covering stories you haven’t seen and viewpoints you haven’t heard, you’ll discover cinematic, data-led shows that investigate the intersection of business and culture. Exploring every angle of climate change, technology, finance, sports and beyond, Bloomberg Originals is business as you’ve never seen it.

Subscribe for business news, but not as you've known it: exclusive interviews, fascinating profiles, data-driven analysis, and the latest in tech innovation from around the world.

Visit our partner channel Bloomberg Quicktake for global news and insight in an instant.

All Comments (21)
  • @user-rf8xl5vm2h
    the problem with the 2% is that the cost of weapons made in the west are just ridiculously high.
  • Peasants like to think the Government is worried with their protection.
  • @Leto2ndAtreides
    ... Who would actually expect Russia to attack a NATO country? Both Russia and NATO are aware of the risks of direct confrontation potentially escalating to nuclear hazard.
  • @nerdError0XF
    2022: Russia is so weak, it cant even win against small Ukraine 2024: Russia is one step from invading Euurope, prepare to defend! lol
  • @johnjohn-gt4eg
    easy fix let Russia build a base in Mexico, problem solved
  • The title of this video should have been - "The high price of running a proxy war against Russia"
  • Russia is a nuclear power If Nuclear weapons are unleashed all this soldiers are history
  • @ilia9048
    And what about the encirclement of Russia by NATO countries all the years after the collapse of the USSR? The US almost brought the Third World War because of missiles in Cuba (which were placed there in response to US missiles in Turkey) - do you think Russia should smile at the encirclement of its borders? If NATO wasn't expanding eastward, the spending wouldn't be necessary. Lithuanian with talk about "imperialism" is straight "the best expert")
  • @normusdoar
    NATO a defense organization that attacked Yugoslavia, Afganistan and provides guns to attacked non member countries = "Defense Organization"
  • @heksogen4788
    You are not detering anything by involving yourself in war outside of your business and borders, you are bringing danger to yourself.
  • @origanami
    "Why spend $1 preventing something when you can spend $100 treating it?" Same thing applies to diplomacy versus military spending.
  • I am reminded of Dialogue in Tamil movie(Indian) Where the Hero says : " Hey , Pigs comes in groups But the Lion comes Alone" 10 Trillions $ Cost against one Country " Russia" . How cheap it would have been if these Countries Guarenteed Russian security.