Beyond ChatGPT: Stuart Russell on the Risks and Rewards of A.I.

Stuart Russell touches all the important themes and he expresses himself wonderfully clear.

Excellent! Couldn't find better questions and explanation than this panel!

👍🏼Great interview from which we learned a lot about AI. 🙏As a side note, would like to appreciate the set designer for giving some life to the set by placing the beautiful flower vases on each table. I think TED talk may need some help from this set designer.

I love how the fact that they could ask a machine a question, it could formulate a cogent response, and read it to you in its own voice, doesn't even register as amazing in itself. 25 years ago that would have seemed impossible. But we're just used to computers talking to us now. We're so focused on what they CAN'T do (yet), that we overlook the amazing things they already do. That's almost troubling in a way.

I’m thinking of all the things that I wouldn’t do with technology such as: Attend a concert or opera, church/worship/pray, read to my grandchildren, participate in a reading/discussion group, raise children, care for pets, swim, travel. These are just off the top of my head…

It’s not just an AI thing: these systems (whether AI, politics, morality, the judiciary, education, etc.) embodies our societal prejudices and ignorances and superstitions. We trust our police to investigate fairly and thoroughly, yet there are countless examples of innocent people incarcerated (even though we’re pretty sure that they’re innocent yet the very police who skewed the evidence or the judges who imposed the sentences refuse to backtrack and admit their arrogance and errors). There’s also countless examples of institutional racism in politics and in the banking and commercial arenas. And don;t get me started on the deluge of ignorant but certain beliefs of all the religious people, not just about an impossible, fantastical god, but also about anything else presented to them in a moral coating that is false but influential enough to cause murder, wars, hatred, prejudicial treatment and even unfair sentencing by same-said justices who believe that they are acting logically and justly! These same people are also being routinely deceived by corporations, governments, and small-time grifters and marketeers (the former being influenced by lobbyists who have no morals nor religiosity, but are only looking for outcomes that increase their profits at any expense to “the others”). AI is learning all this and is trusting it as “normal” and “right”. Which side will it support on issues such as abortion or transgenders, or our banking systems, or health and nutrition? Currently, it’s being “spanked” for assisted suicides. Why is that “wrong”? Who will do the spanking when it comes to assisted abortions? Or assisted disinformation campaigns? Or assisted marketing campaigns (persuading people to buy products and services that they didn’t really want or need or can afford or which are unhealthy)? What about assisted match-making (good?) or assisted divorce (bad) or assisted grooming of minors or non-believers or Republicans/Democrats/socialists/environmentalists? My guess is that AI will amplify and ultimately codify whatever the dominant control structure that’s in force - we don’t know what that is yet, but we can probably guess the most likely candidates: conservative, religious, profit-based, monopolistic, wealth concentration, media disinformation and propaganda, division and hatred, food & drug & material goods dependencies, etc. Will there be competing AI? Will these competing systems wage a kind of war on each other? Will there be rebel or “alternative” forms of AI that embody other values and “facts”? Either way, it’ll probably be business as usual - the wealthy “families” each controlling their own turf and occasionally trying to muscle in on each other when the opportunities arise. The rest of may get a slight choice in what flavor of AI to subscribe to. And the thorny problem of what to do with all those unemployed, desperate, poverty-stricken (and increasingly angry and violent) people will probably be solved with Universal Income and a kind of happiness drug or pastime. (Brave New World…)

Thanks for posting this!

Great teachers. I took a lot from this. Thanks for the precious insights into this topic.

Good talk. Stuart Russell made some interesting and insightful points as always. Although I'd say that babysitters are paid less than surgeons due to supply and demand. Because although I'd rather lose my leg to a bad surgeon than lose my child to a bad babysitter, it's easy to find a person will the skills and willingness to take care of your child for a day than it is to find a person with the skills and willingness to not mess up my knee surgery. However, I do agree that interpersonal relationships will become more and more important. Because anything that can be commoditised, will be. Funnily enough, that already includes some interpersonal relationships. We keep trying to rationalise why we should pick a himan over an AI with stuff like "But can a bot love?", "But is a bot conscious?". It's irrelevant. And we can't rule out the fact that they may one day do these things. In fact, I choose human charities over animal charities. But animals can think, feel and love. Kinda racist, I suppose. But we'll see whether that changes as AI becomes more developed.

One of my sons worked on the early developing of AI for the military and is also having some second thoughts about it because of the damage it could do in the wrong hands. He has been worried about it for years.

Let us all agree that words have different meanings to different people from different backgrounds. We apply empiricism and try to fathom meaning from context for the sake of practicality. It is very human to communicate in this way. Unless we are writing up the Constitution!

What a Brilliant research !

Was a bit dissapointed by the end. Theyre clearly still thinking in somewhat outdated terms. He says you cant get those feelings of interpersonal relationships with robots, forgetting they mentioned earlier that people are already doing this?? These things are all relative and subjective. There is no fine line of what it means to be aware, intelligent etc or not. People dont yet realize this and its going to bite them eventually

There was a lot of real water used in the movie titanic, they filmed a lot of the “in water” scenes in a large water tank in Mexico,..if he asked chat gpt it would have informed him of that 😀

Those “as an ai language model” answers are the result of alignment tuning - it’s specifically trained to say those things, that’s not the answer you’d get from the raw model. My point is that it would have been clearer in that segment if they’d made it clear that they were essentially reading out OpenAI’s marketing literature there, not actually talking to the model at its full power. Good discussion though!

Thank you for this video. Excellent!

I really enjoyed it, wow, very informative, thanks from Rome.

It's amazing how the ability to predict the next word can result in...

35:20 through 41:31: Guidelines and legislation and "Right to Explanation!". Good stuff!

There are crossover points between logical coding and abstract math. Then again between code and abstractions of code. Then again between code and comprehension of code. Then again between quantum level electrical activity and code. Then again between electricity and consciously aware electrical activity. How then do we know for sure what is or is not consciously self aware?