Xiaomi Watch 2 vs OnePlus Watch 2 vs Samsung Watch 6 Classic vs TicWatch Pro 5 - Ultimate Comparison

The Samsung watch 6 should lose points for forcing you to use a Samsung phone to take full advantage of its features. That was the single greatest reason why I did not buy it and went with the TicWatch Pro 5. You are clearly favoring the Samsung watch.

The only difference between the Snapdragon W5 and the W5+ is that the Plus version also has a dedicated secondary ultra-low power processor for battery saving purposes. However, Oneplus has opted to implement its own ultra-low power processor (BE7200) instead, which is much better optimised than what we've seen so far in smartwatches with the W5+ Gen 1, which is a plus for me.

How about points off for being the highest cost watch? You can't fairly compare a watch that is less than half the cost of the highest cost watch. Of course, the highest cost watch is going to have more features, sensors, and styling.

I get 4 to 5 days battery life on my oneplus watch 2!

Some things about the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic really disappointed me. There are a lot of non-removable Samsung apps, no ECG/blood pressure functionality on non-Samsung phones (although I managed to make it work with a forum post from XDA Developers, it required a lot of effort), it requires the use of 3 separate apps (which makes it a bit confusing and definitely over-engineered), and the battery life is very short. That's why I eventually bought the OnePlus Watch 2. It's not perfect; the app is definitely not as good as Samsung's, but the battery life is awesome. Additionally, I encountered a pairing issue with the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic. Overnight, it suddenly stopped connecting to my phone. The only way to get it working again was to perform a factory reset on the watch. (I'm using a non-Samsung phone)

I have a Samsung phone and watch 6 due to seamless integration. However, I wondered what other watches offered. Your comparison was very helpful regarding software and battery performance. As a whole, well done!

The Ticwatch has a built-in compass therefore the Ticwatch also has a built-in geomagnetic sensor. Also as far as I know the Ticwatch does not support the Google assistant.

Why is no one covering the step count accuracy of these watches ?

I just buy my GW 6 Classic 47mm ⌚️ today at 361$ on Amazon and I already have the GW 5 . 44mm I paid 127$ at that time and I love this watch ⌚️ alot 👍🏾💯🏆

Tic-watch pro 5 is my favourite watch I love the fact it has sandwich 2 screens and the battery life otherwise all of them are just the same I bought my watch because of your opinion of the tic-watch pro 5 previously

My dougth is beteween Ticwatch 5 pro (Enduro) and One Plus Watch 5!Many Thanks

Not very accurate comparison

Wow! Another brilliant comparison video! 👏 Chigz is the best, especially when it comes to smartwatch vids and comparisons ❤

Excellent review as always. The one thing I am pretty sure you miss out on is the advantage of being able to charge the Samsung with reverse wireless charging from a phone or battery pack. As mentioned previously, this facility more than makes up for any battery disadvantage of the Classic (though the 5 Pro does have much more comparable battery to these others).

WOULDN'T IT BE GREAT IF... Mobvoi (for their next TicWatch Pro 6) ran the same OnePlus watch 2's dual SOC/Operating system architecure? The dual screen already helps with an impressive battery life, so with that 'Dual SOC/OS system' too to give it a WAY better battery life (possibly into the GREAT top Huawei watch batt life territory)? HECK I'D BUY THAT! 😏👌 😎🇬🇧

Xiaomi gives similar build with half price, great job. I just made my order, not sure if the hardware is reliable

you should make a point for the pricing

Lots of misinformation in this video, 👎 from me. Buggest one i noticed is that the Ticwatch Pro 5 does NOT have the Google Assistant which is a huge letdown.

So biased for Samsung watch makes this review less credible tbh

I got the OnePlus, fits perfectly and cost less.......google pay compatibility, nuff said!