WorstFish: The Dumbest Chess Bot

1,142,014
0
Published 2023-08-08
➡️ Get My Chess Courses: www.chessly.com/
➡️ Get my best-selling chess book: geni.us/gothamchess

➡️ My book in the UK and Europe: bit.ly/3qFqSf7
➡️ Mein Buch auf Deutsch: bit.ly/45fKt3R
➡️ Mi libro en Español: bit.ly/3Y5xaRx

➡️ Start Playing Chess FOR FREE: bit.ly/3Xa3EsB

➡️ Enjoy my videos? Donate Here : www.paypal.me/gothamchess

Email me your games: [email protected]
Sponsors, Business, Media: [email protected] - [DO NOT SEND GAMES HERE]

⭐️ Follow Me If You Are Amazing:
➡️ CAMEO: www.cameo.com/gothamchess
➡️ SNAP: www.snapchat.com/add/levy.rozman
➡️ INSTAGRAM: www.instagram.com/gothamchess/
➡️ TWITCH: www.twitch.tv/gothamchess
➡️ TIKTOK: www.tiktok.com/@levyrozman
➡️ TWITTER: twitter.com/gothamchess
➡️ GOTHAM DISCORD: discord.gg/f2ETqcWKdt

➡️ THUMBNAILS BY: www.instagram.com/jchessnoob/

All Comments (21)
  • @paul_warner
    In my opinion this is literally the most impressive chess game of all time.
  • @majormoron605
    Chucking all your pieces to loose a game is childplay. Forcing your opponent to checkmate you while being up the maximum amount of materiel, now that is genius
  • @Vetrical
    3:55 "how do you beat something that is trying to lose?" you make them win
  • @CypherSteve
    This is probably one of the best chess games I've ever seen, a bot that is programmed to lose no matter what it takes being forced to checkmate its opponent... SENSATIONAL
  • Incredible. Worstfish's mistake was in not considering that his opponent may play terribly, which would actually change the moves he would do.
  • @Bellezzasolo
    CautiousSeat: masterfully manoeuvres WorstFish into a position where it is forced to play checkmate. WorstFish: I'm gonna do what's called a pro-gamer move resigns
  • @magica3526
    worstfish doesn't always make the stockfish minimum move, because stockfish always assumes taht future moves will be optimal. In the opening scenario, f4 cuts them off from giving up their knight on that square, not something stockfish considers
  • @CucuChessNerd
    64 squares, 100 queens. 36 queens noclipped alongside the kings, nice
  • @mach4518
    "Are you actually a winner if you help the other person get their desired result?" That quote isn't talked about enough😂😂😂
  • @IDMYM8
    The beauty is not just that he made the worst bot to win by checkmate, it's the sophistication on making the bot beat Black AFTER achieving the highest material advantage possible here. IT'S NOT JUST MAKING THE BOT WIN SOMEHOW, WHICH IS A CHALLENGE ON ITS SELF BUT.... ALSO ACHIEVING THE BEST CONDITION FOR THE BOT TO WIN! UNFATHOMABLE!
  • @Tw1stTech
    Throwing is one thing - but forcing an opponent that tries its absolute hardest to lose to actually mate you is just devastating levels of genius. I wouldn’t want someone like this on the other side of my board or opposite me in any interaction really
  • @arthurioffin
    As the queen, I can confirm 100 of us fit on 64 squares (we had bunk beds).
  • @keshatchum
    Everyone saying “oh why is worst fish a grandmaster??” but it you think about it, you have to know what the best move is to be able to play the worst…
  • @GLOWINTHEDARKCIA
    It's official. Humans ARE better than robots at being worse at chess!
  • @DepressedLaughter
    this kind of feels more impressive than any other chess achievement I've seen
  • Gotham getting all philosophical in this video. "What does it truly mean to win?"
  • @cbplayz2374
    I love how they absolutely didn't need to get nine queens, they just did it for the big number on the side. Like a victory lap.